|
|
GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER
Can a Biomarker Predict Therapeutic Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal
Cancer?
You have heard of designer drugs and designer jeans, but what about “designer genes”?
The KRAS gene mutation status has been shown to have predictive value for treatment
with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy in the first-line therapy of patients with
metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase III CRYSTAL trial. KRAS mutation
status (normal or wild-type [wt] vs. mutated [mt]) was determined in the tumor tissue
of 540 patients, and a retrospective analysis was done to evaluate the impact of
the KRAS mutations. Treatment was FOLFIRI alone vs. cetuximab plus FOLFIRI (F+C)
and primary endpoint was PFS with secondary endpoint RR. Results: PFS for all 1,198
patients favored F+C (HR=0.85, p=0.048) and RR 47% F+C vs. 39% F alone. KRAS wild-type
(wt) PFS=HR 0.68, p=0.017 and PFS for KRAS mt (mutant type) HR=1.07, p=0.47; RR
for KRAS wt 59% F+C vs. 43% for F alone (p=0.0025) and RR in KRAS mt 36.2% F+C vs.
40.2% F alone.
Conclusion: This large study shows that addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI significantly
increases the PFS compared to chemotherapy alone. The data demonstrate that the
treatment effect of cetuximab in patients with KRAS wt is significantly enhanced
compared to FOLFIRI alone, whereas patients with KRAS mt do not benefit from C+F.
Cetuximab + FOLFIRI could now be considered a first-line option for mCRC in those
with KRAS wild-type mutation.
Abstract #2 E. Van Cutsem, et al. Plenary Session-J Clin Oncol 26: 2008
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer:
Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?
Final results of CONKO-001, a randomized phase III trial
of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in 354 eligible patients
with resected pancreatic cancer (PC), were presented. After stratification for complete
(RO or R1) resection, nodal involvement, and tumor stage patients were randomized
to receive either gemcitabine (G) 1 g/m2 d1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months
or observation (O). Primary endpoint was DFS, with secondary endpoints OS and toxicity.
Results: The analyses confirm significant improvement for G in median DFS (G: 13.4
months, O: 6.9 months, p<0.001). Estimated DFS at 3 and 5 years was 23.5% and
16.0% in G vs. 8.5% and 6.5% in the O group. G significantly improves median OS
(G: 22.8 months, O: 20.2 months, p=0.005). Estimated survival at 3 and 5 years was
36.5% and 21.0% for G patients vs. 19.5% and 9.0% for O group patients.
Conclusion: Treatment with gemcitabine for 6 months in patients after complete resection
of PC significantly increases DFS and OS compared with O alone. Impressive results
in this disease. I think we do see a light.
LBA4504 P. Neuhaus, et al. J Clin Oncol 26: 2008
|
|